Page 22 - index
P. 22

TOP COVER 524+0)






       PIMs  are  content  and  find  it  easier  to   2418+&+0) #%%17065  #22 ­      policing. As a result of that observation a
       actually read this out to Principal Officers       61                        small working group was set up to review
       following  their  initial  meet  and  greet.  I   I  make  this  personal  comment  from   and make recommendations on how the
       must admit it doesn’t exactly roll off the   the outset – “It would be a very sad day   relevant sections in the manual could be
       tongue and (according to some Principal   for British policing if, following the fatal   amended  and  be  better  used  practically.
       Officers I know) can come across as a bit   shooting of a member of the public, we did   T at  working  group  consisted  of  the
       of a formal warning. I prefer to simplify it   not as a Police Service provide some form   NPIA  (College  of  Policing),  National
       in my own words.                     of account to support the Investigation.” I   and  Metropolitan  Police  Federation,
         T ere  is  a  degree  of  caution  to  be   fully accept that there is always a proviso   RJW (now Slater and Gordon) Lawyers,
       considered  around  this  issue  which   that this is subject to legal advice because   Superintendent’s  Association,  the  IPCC
       I  would  urge  all  to  be  aware  of.  It  is   Principal Officers, whether we like it or   and yours truly.
       that  period  of  time  between  the  actual   not, are vulnerable and may be subject to   I know what you are thinking – how
       shooting and the Principals returning to   possible  legal  proceedings.  I  appreciate   on earth did you get a decision out of that
       the  PIM  suite.  How  did  officers  travel   there has to be a balance but I believe the   group? Well we did through appreciation
       to  the  PIM  suite,  who  were  they  with,   PIM  process  can  and  does  provide  that   of  each  other’s  role,  open  mindedness,
       what was said and about what? I believe   relevant balance and protection.   frankness  and  hard  work.  In  fact  it  was
       it is essential for Principal Officers to try   So why did we need a new section in   one of the best working groups I have sat
       (and I am sure that is extremely difficult   the  Manual  around  providing  accounts?   on – well facilitated by Kevin Nicholson
       immediately post-incident) to recall and   Simply  because  the  existing  sections   from the College of Policing, appropriate
       record that fact at the earliest opportunity   around ‘Initial Account’ was not explicit   in numbers and all having a passion to get
       (subject to legal advice) and for the PIM   enough  and  therefore  open  to  varied   it right. Okay, I accept it is a little ‘wordy’
       to advise them to do so at the PIM suite. It   interpretations across the UK. To be fair   but I suppose we could not expect much
       is my information that Officers may leave   to the IPCC, this was picked up by one   else when we were dealing with such an
       themselves  vulnerable  and  open  to  later   of their leading Senior Investigators, and   important  issue  following  any  police
       unprepared scrutiny on this issue in later   highlighted in an entirely appropriate way   shooting. T ose stages are:
       proceedings. Forearmed is forewarned!  via the ACPO working group on armed


           56#)'             5+67#6+10 4'2146

           56#)'             2+/ $#5+% (#%65

           56#)'             2'4510#. +0+6+#. #%%1706

           56#)'             &'6#+.'& #%%1706  '8+&'06+#. 56#6'/'06


         Let  me  then  talk  you  through  those   medical advice – an important protection   rare event, a Principal Officer is suspected
       four stages but first of all make it clear that   factor  for  the  ‘Principal  Officer’.  If  a   of a criminal or misconduct offence, then
       not each stage has to be completed or will   Principal  Officer  is  unfit  to  make  a   obviously stages 3 and 4 will not apply.
       be completed in every incident. Stages 2,   personal initial account then stage three is
       3 and 4 will always be subject to legal or   unlikely to take place and if, in the very



          56#)'

               (QNNQYKPI VJG FKUEJCTIG QH C      6JG 6CEVKECN (KTGCTOU              6JG KPHQTOCVKQP RTQXKFGF
               »TGCTO D[ VJG RQNKEG              %QOOCPFGT QT (QTEG                 UJQWNF DG UWH»EKGPV VQ
                                                 %QPVTQN 4QQO OWUV DG               RTQXKFG C UKV TGR CPF GPCDNG
                                                 KPHQTOGF                           VJG 6(% VQ FKUEJCTIG
                                                                                    VJGKT RQUV KPEKFGPV
                                                                                    TGURQPUKDKNKVKGU


         Pretty  simple  and  non-contentious  I   this will lay heavily with the Operational   or sit reps coming from the scene. We need
       would  suggest?  However,  some  thought   Firearms  Commander  / Team  Leader  at   to be careful here. One short, concise and
       and  appropriate  training  should  be   the scene of any incident. I have heard of   factual sit rep is the order of the day as
       provided to those whose responsibility it   occasions where, allegedly there have been   opposed to disjointed, long winded and
       may be to give that sit rep. I would suggest   four or five different versions of ‘accounts’   differing versions.
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27