Page 9 - Top Cover Issue 15
P. 9

MAY 2019   TOP COVER   9









       type of attack we are experiencing
       in the UK.
        Currently, we go from ‘zero to hero’,
       from an officer with baton, spray and
       maybe a Taser to an ARV, essentially
       a SWAT team capable of storming
       buildings with stun grenades. We
       simply do not need thousands more
       officers trained in all of these tactics,
       but we do need more officers able to
       stop a low-sophistication attack. This
       would create a new layer of armed
       policing. Local police acting only in an  Picture copyright: HiStock Photo / Shutterstock
       emergency with ARVs and their wide
       range of tactics arriving in support to
       deal with long-term containment and
       searches. The local police would only
       need basic tactics – emergency search,
       containment, dealing with suspects on   Local police carrying sidearms and acting only in an emergency would be able to
       foot and in vehicles and critical shot.  counter the vast majority of current threats
        Often raised as a concern is our
                                            Others have argued that we survived   be assured that if they use their weapon
       capability to recruit and train armed
                                           the IRA threat without arming      correctly, they will have the backing of
       officers, as many fail. In my area 10%
                                           officers, seemingly forgetting that the   not just the police, but also the IOPC,
       fail on advanced driving, but for local
                                           IRA terrorists aimed to escape and   the media, courts and the Government.
       police this would not be an issue. A
                                           fight another day, whereas the current   Second, money. To arm all willing
       third fail the advanced search tactics
                                           breed of terrorist continues to kill   and suitable officers with a sidearm
       (D4), but with fewer tactics taught to
                                           until someone steps up and neutralises   would cost millions of pounds. The
       local police, less would fail. This new
                                           them. Tactically, little comparison can   expense is not so much the one-off
       breed of officer must not be trained to
                                           be drawn with the IRA.             purchase of weapons but the additional
       a lower standard, simply with fewer
                                            Ultimately, this debate can be    instructors required – teaching
       tactics and with fewer weapons.
                                           resolved simply by how long the    someone how to shoot (and regularly
                                           public are willing to wait for an armed   requalifying them) is labour intensive.
       Will, money and time
                                           response (it would be interesting to   Cash-strapped forces should not be
        There are three blockers to achieving
                                           actually ask them!), and what response   expected to pick up these costs. The
       this goal: the will to change, money   time the chiefs and the Government   training infrastructure is simply too
       and time. Despite the PFEW poll
                                           are willing to tolerate. I fear if we had   small – if you are going to train more
       revealing that just six per cent of
                                           an attack now in a small city or market   people to shoot guns you need more
       officers think there are sufficient armed   town, the subsequent public enquiry   ranges. This is all going to require
       officers, the information coming out   would show far too little had been   significant investment of new money.
       of the Chiefs’ Council appears to   done to deal with this foreseeable risk.   Finally, time. It would take at least
       show that chief officers are against   Potentially, this is the next big scandal   five years to achieve this. That’s a long
       arming more officers on the ground.   in policing.                     time, and we need to get this debate
       MPS Commissioner Cressida Dick       The will of officers to carry weapons   into the open so that whatever we
       seemed to dismiss the idea on Radio   also remains an issue and officers must   decide, we can start it soon.
        (6)
       4 , preferring mobile specialist units,
       saying that “people don’t want to see   (1) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/
                                           attachment_data/file/726401/hosb1118-police-workforce.pdf
       officers armed to the teeth on every
                                           (2) https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/26/armed-police-operations-rise-19-in-
       street corner” – which is certainly    england-and-wales
       not what is being suggested. Maybe   (3) http://www.polfed.org/documents/PFEW%20Routine%20Arming%20Survey%20
                                           2017%20Headline%20Report%20-%20Sep%202017.pdf
       this would work well in a major
                                           (4) https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/dec/07/rural-police-forces-consider-giving-
       city but we simply cannot afford    guns-to-regular-officers
       a standing army of ARVs in rural    (5) http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/give-more-armed-police-terror-10560552
                                           (6) http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08sks0t time code: 2.19.17
       areas, or on trains.
                                                                                                 WWW.PFOA.CO.UK
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14